Investigation Targets Six Officials in Flood Control Fraud
A significant investigation into alleged corruption in flood control projects has led to the Independent Commission for Infrastructure (ICI) requesting charges against six prominent figures in the Philippines. This inquiry, which began in September 2025, aims to address serious concerns regarding the integrity of public works and the management of infrastructure funds.
Details of the Investigation
On October 29, 2025, the ICI formally requested the Ombudsman to file charges against the following individuals:
– Roberto Bernardo, former undersecretary of the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) – Senator Joel Villanueva – Senator Jinggoy Estrada – Former Congressman Zaldy Co – Commission on Audit Commissioner Mario Lipana – Former Congresswoman Mitch Cajayon Uy
These officials are implicated in fraudulent activities related to non-existent flood control projects, often referred to as “ghost” projects. This marks the second referral to the Ombudsman by the ICI, indicating a deepening investigation into public works anomalies.
Background of the ICI
Established by President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. in September 2025 through Executive Order No. 94, the ICI was created to scrutinize infrastructure projects, particularly those concerning flood control, over the past decade. The commission’s efforts are supported by Justice Secretary Jesus Crispin Remulla, who has endorsed the charges based on an affidavit from a dismissed engineer. The Department of Justice is currently reviewing additional evidence related to the case.
Current Status of the Accused
Among the accused, Zaldy Co has been reported missing since his departure from the United States on September 13, 2025, with unverified sightings in various countries, including Singapore, Spain, Dubai, and Portugal. Should he fail to respond to a subpoena, the ICI may pursue a contempt petition against him.
Additionally, the investigation is examining the potential involvement of Mario Lipana, particularly concerning his spouse’s role as a contractor in the disputed projects. This scrutiny comes amid rising public concern about flooding in the Philippines, especially following recent typhoons that have highlighted the inadequacies of existing infrastructure.
Political Implications
The legal challenges faced by Senators Villanueva and Estrada are intensifying political tensions, particularly as the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee continues its oversight of the situation. This case underscores the ongoing struggles within the Philippines to combat corruption and ensure accountability in government projects.
FAQs
What prompted the investigation into these officials?
The investigation was initiated due to allegations of fraudulent flood control projects, which were identified as “ghost” projects lacking any actual implementation.
What is the role of the Independent Commission for Infrastructure?
The ICI was established to investigate and oversee infrastructure projects in the Philippines, focusing on ensuring transparency and accountability in public works.
What are the potential consequences for the accused officials?
If found guilty, the officials could face criminal charges, which may include imprisonment and fines, depending on the severity of their involvement in the fraudulent activities.
Conclusion
The ongoing investigation into the six officials marks a critical step in addressing corruption within the Philippines’ infrastructure sector. As the ICI continues its work, the outcomes of these charges could significantly impact public trust and the future of governance in the country. The situation remains fluid, with further developments expected as the inquiry progresses.
The investigation into the alleged corruption surrounding flood control projects is part of a broader effort by the Philippine government to enhance accountability in public infrastructure spending. Over the years, the country has faced numerous challenges related to flooding, exacerbated by climate change and inadequate infrastructure. The scrutiny of these officials reflects a growing public demand for transparency in how government funds are allocated and utilized, particularly in light of recent natural disasters that have underscored the vulnerabilities of existing systems.
The ICI’s establishment and subsequent actions signal a commitment to reforming the infrastructure sector, which has historically been plagued by inefficiencies and corruption. As the inquiry unfolds, it may lead to further investigations into other officials and contractors involved in similar projects, potentially reshaping the landscape of public works in the Philippines. The outcomes of this case could also influence future legislation aimed at improving oversight mechanisms and ensuring that infrastructure projects genuinely meet the needs of the population.
Also Read:
Investigation Requested for US Airstrike on Yemen Prison
Hurricane Melissa: Unprecedented Strength and Climate Impact
